Sirbed

2011-02-05 15:32:24 UTC

"Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"

(See also our sister website reticsessays.com)

Make any replies to ***@Verizon.net.

"Great spirits have always encountered violent oppositions from

mediocre minds." - A. Einstein

Following his success with The Special Theory of Relativity, Dr.

Einstein extended his approach to include accelerated reference frames. It

was his contention that the force produced by a gravitational field could be

considered to be equivalent to the inertial force produced by a spatial

acceleration. The result was a postulate, the Principle of Equivalence,

which along with the Principle of Relativity upon which Special Relativity

was based, led to the generation of the General Theory of Relativity.

Dr. Einstein struggled for a year and a half to solve the mathematics

involved and finally produced the General Theory of Relativity. For this

effort he is considered to be a world class genius on a par with Newton.

What is conveniently forgotten is that in order to solve the mathematics he

was forced to invent the idea of "curved space" to make the mathematical

solution

work, it would not work in terms of our familiar three dimensional space!

When this introduction was introduced at a convention of physicists

considering General Relativity, it was accepted with the comment "why

shouldn't we consider space to be curved NOBODY CAN PROVE THAT IT ISN'T".

(Weren't they objective scientists?)

An alarm bell should ring when one examines the conclusions of General

Relativity and of Special Relativity. One does not need a high level of

brilliance or education to recognize that the two theories are incompatible

and, as a result, cannot satisfy the Principle of Equivalence! Somewhere in

the mathematics an error had been made. The existence of this error is made

evident

by the fact that, in a force-length-time system of measurement, there

exists, under Special Relativity, the Lorentz Transformations for Length and

for Time. Under General Relativity, on the other hand, while there is a

transformation for time (the time dilation), there is no analogous

transformation for length. It is the absence of this transformation which

required the concept of "curved space" to make the mathematics self

consistent.

General Relativity was accepted after it "correctly" predicted the time

dilation, the precession of Mercury's Orbit, and the bending of light as it

passed the Sun. What was conveniently overlooked was the fact that the Sun's

field is about 5 orders of magnitude too weak to reveal the error which

exists. (This error could be observed in the vicinity of a neutron star, but

the observation would have to be coupled with a close in orbital observation

to be

meaningful.)

When one examines the mathematical treatment which produced General

Relativity to find the source of obvious error in the theory, it is not hard

to find that error. The mathematics involved the double integration of and

equation in the form:- (dS)^2= (dX)^2+(dY)^2+(dZ)^2-(Kt*C*dT)^2 where Kt is

the time transformation provided by Special Relativity.

Anyone who is familiar with integral calculus will recognize that, to

be rigorously correct, coefficients must be provided for the length terms

(dX), (dY), and (dZ). The failure to include such coefficients arbitrarily

sets them at unity. The effect is, to borrow a term from the legal

profession, the arbitrary assumption of a fact not yet in evidence. Adding

such coefficients does not introduce an error, if they are not required the

mathematical solution will set them at unity and no harm will be done. If

they are required, the solution will either be in error or will be

impossible (as was the case with General Relativity). Unfortunately, instead

of correcting this error, Dr. Einstein resorted to the fakery of "curved

space"! For the derivation of General

Relativity to have been rigorous, the equation to be integrated should have

been written: (dS)^2= (Kx*dX)^2+(Ky*dY)^2+(Kz*dZ)^2-(Kt*C*dT)^2 While

separate coefficients for X, Y, and Z are required for rigor, it is not

unreasonable to assume that space is isotropic and set Kx, Ky, and Kz are

equal and set them equal to K. If this had been done, General Relativity

would have yielded its result in terms of our normal three dimensional

Euclidean Space.

The existence of this error is evident in the difficulty in reconciling

General Relativity with Quantum Theory without mathematically resorting to

fictitious extra dimensions (eleven dimensional space seems to be currently

in vogue). When one corrects the information provided by General Relativity,

which has been derived independently by two other independent methods, an

entirely different picture of reality emerges. Energy is found to be

conserved in the absolute sense, the source of the force of gravity is

revealed, and our cosmological observations are provided with a clear

explanation. It shows that the "big bang" origin of our universe never

happened. As observed from the inside of a gravitationally collapsing

object, the object appears to contract until a radius of four times the

horizon radius is reached and then is observed to expand to an infinite

radius as its absolute radius contracts to the horizon radius. Gravity is

revealed to be a force resulting from the release of mass energy due to the

contraction of matter as a result of a reduction of elevation. The subject

is treated in detail in

http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm.

The source material for this posting may be found in

http://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm (1997); http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm

(1987); and http://einsteinhoax.com/relcor.htm (1997). EVERYTHING WHICH WE

ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE HAVE ACCEPTED AS

TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST BE

MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS

REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP FROM

THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.

All of the Newsposts made by this site may be viewed at the

http://einsteinhoax.com/postinglog.htm.

Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on

a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy

as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts,

please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you

have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.

E-mail:- ***@verizon.net. If you wish a reply, be sure that

your mail reception is not blocked.

The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 8

years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE

MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by

individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without

questioning it. If anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be

objectively answered, the material at the Website will be withdrawn.

Challenges to date have revealed only the responder's inadequacy with one

exception for which a correction was provided.

(See also our sister website reticsessays.com)

Make any replies to ***@Verizon.net.

"Great spirits have always encountered violent oppositions from

mediocre minds." - A. Einstein

Following his success with The Special Theory of Relativity, Dr.

Einstein extended his approach to include accelerated reference frames. It

was his contention that the force produced by a gravitational field could be

considered to be equivalent to the inertial force produced by a spatial

acceleration. The result was a postulate, the Principle of Equivalence,

which along with the Principle of Relativity upon which Special Relativity

was based, led to the generation of the General Theory of Relativity.

Dr. Einstein struggled for a year and a half to solve the mathematics

involved and finally produced the General Theory of Relativity. For this

effort he is considered to be a world class genius on a par with Newton.

What is conveniently forgotten is that in order to solve the mathematics he

was forced to invent the idea of "curved space" to make the mathematical

solution

work, it would not work in terms of our familiar three dimensional space!

When this introduction was introduced at a convention of physicists

considering General Relativity, it was accepted with the comment "why

shouldn't we consider space to be curved NOBODY CAN PROVE THAT IT ISN'T".

(Weren't they objective scientists?)

An alarm bell should ring when one examines the conclusions of General

Relativity and of Special Relativity. One does not need a high level of

brilliance or education to recognize that the two theories are incompatible

and, as a result, cannot satisfy the Principle of Equivalence! Somewhere in

the mathematics an error had been made. The existence of this error is made

evident

by the fact that, in a force-length-time system of measurement, there

exists, under Special Relativity, the Lorentz Transformations for Length and

for Time. Under General Relativity, on the other hand, while there is a

transformation for time (the time dilation), there is no analogous

transformation for length. It is the absence of this transformation which

required the concept of "curved space" to make the mathematics self

consistent.

General Relativity was accepted after it "correctly" predicted the time

dilation, the precession of Mercury's Orbit, and the bending of light as it

passed the Sun. What was conveniently overlooked was the fact that the Sun's

field is about 5 orders of magnitude too weak to reveal the error which

exists. (This error could be observed in the vicinity of a neutron star, but

the observation would have to be coupled with a close in orbital observation

to be

meaningful.)

When one examines the mathematical treatment which produced General

Relativity to find the source of obvious error in the theory, it is not hard

to find that error. The mathematics involved the double integration of and

equation in the form:- (dS)^2= (dX)^2+(dY)^2+(dZ)^2-(Kt*C*dT)^2 where Kt is

the time transformation provided by Special Relativity.

Anyone who is familiar with integral calculus will recognize that, to

be rigorously correct, coefficients must be provided for the length terms

(dX), (dY), and (dZ). The failure to include such coefficients arbitrarily

sets them at unity. The effect is, to borrow a term from the legal

profession, the arbitrary assumption of a fact not yet in evidence. Adding

such coefficients does not introduce an error, if they are not required the

mathematical solution will set them at unity and no harm will be done. If

they are required, the solution will either be in error or will be

impossible (as was the case with General Relativity). Unfortunately, instead

of correcting this error, Dr. Einstein resorted to the fakery of "curved

space"! For the derivation of General

Relativity to have been rigorous, the equation to be integrated should have

been written: (dS)^2= (Kx*dX)^2+(Ky*dY)^2+(Kz*dZ)^2-(Kt*C*dT)^2 While

separate coefficients for X, Y, and Z are required for rigor, it is not

unreasonable to assume that space is isotropic and set Kx, Ky, and Kz are

equal and set them equal to K. If this had been done, General Relativity

would have yielded its result in terms of our normal three dimensional

Euclidean Space.

The existence of this error is evident in the difficulty in reconciling

General Relativity with Quantum Theory without mathematically resorting to

fictitious extra dimensions (eleven dimensional space seems to be currently

in vogue). When one corrects the information provided by General Relativity,

which has been derived independently by two other independent methods, an

entirely different picture of reality emerges. Energy is found to be

conserved in the absolute sense, the source of the force of gravity is

revealed, and our cosmological observations are provided with a clear

explanation. It shows that the "big bang" origin of our universe never

happened. As observed from the inside of a gravitationally collapsing

object, the object appears to contract until a radius of four times the

horizon radius is reached and then is observed to expand to an infinite

radius as its absolute radius contracts to the horizon radius. Gravity is

revealed to be a force resulting from the release of mass energy due to the

contraction of matter as a result of a reduction of elevation. The subject

is treated in detail in

http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm.

The source material for this posting may be found in

http://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm (1997); http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm

(1987); and http://einsteinhoax.com/relcor.htm (1997). EVERYTHING WHICH WE

ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE HAVE ACCEPTED AS

TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST BE

MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS

REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP FROM

THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.

All of the Newsposts made by this site may be viewed at the

http://einsteinhoax.com/postinglog.htm.

Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on

a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy

as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts,

please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you

have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.

E-mail:- ***@verizon.net. If you wish a reply, be sure that

your mail reception is not blocked.

The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 8

years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE

MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by

individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without

questioning it. If anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be

objectively answered, the material at the Website will be withdrawn.

Challenges to date have revealed only the responder's inadequacy with one

exception for which a correction was provided.