Daniel cell and absurdities of modern science

[sorin]

Daniel cell and absurdities of modern science


A critique analysis of Daniel's cell is provided at following link
(improved):

http://www.elkadot.com/chemistry/Daniel%20cell%20and%20the%20salt%20bridge.htm

The old Daniel cell and some of its variants have not get a coherent
explanation in actual orthodox science.

A modern variant, using a salt bridge between half cells, is found to
be non-functional. More precisely, the salt bridge, formed by an inert
salt, does not participate at general reaction chain, so no reaction
takes place inside such cell. Such cell can be leaved in short-circuit
position for months without a significant consume of electrodes or
without solution color modification. Of course, in this case, there is
a small residual current due to the reaction between Zn and water, but
this is a secondary reaction and not the expected reaction able to
produce the expected current.

Further, the actual explanation can be proved to be false using
simple chemical reactions able to be performed in any low level school
laboratory.

Regards,
Sorin Cosofret

[Chris]

bravo for your experiments but this has nothing to do with fusion. By the
way the reason your salt bridge works is that the cell is delivering no
current if you put a 2 ohm resistor in the circuit in parallel with the
meter you would get a different result.
--
Chris.
Remove ns_ to reply

Post by sorin
Daniel cell and absurdities of modern science
A critique analysis of Daniel's cell is provided at following link
http://www.elkadot.com/chemistry/Daniel%20cell%20and%20the%20salt%20bridge.htm
The old Daniel cell and some of its variants have not get a coherent
explanation in actual orthodox science.
A modern variant, using a salt bridge between half cells, is found to
be non-functional. More precisely, the salt bridge, formed by an inert
salt, does not participate at general reaction chain, so no reaction
takes place inside such cell. Such cell can be leaved in short-circuit
position for months without a significant consume of electrodes or
without solution color modification. Of course, in this case, there is
a small residual current due to the reaction between Zn and water, but
this is a secondary reaction and not the expected reaction able to
produce the expected current.
Further, the actual explanation can be proved to be false using
simple chemical reactions able to be performed in any low level school
laboratory.
Regards,
Sorin Cosofret