sorin
2009-08-21 13:08:25 UTC
Ionization energy, work function and absurdity of modern science
The neglected ionization energy variation for isoelectronic series can
reveal more useful information about electrons structure; the problem
is these data are in contradiction with actual quantum theory.
The quantum prediction for work functions values are in contradiction
with experiments; for metals, ionization energy and work function must
be equal but in reality they are not.
For other classes of compounds quantum mechanic fails again to predict
something. A striking example is the case of metallic oxides having
work functions values smaller then metals. It is outrageous how a
covalent or ionic bound liberate electrons easier then a metallic
bound in frame of actual physics.
The improved link:
http://www.elkadot.com/chemistry/Ionization%20energy%20and%20work%20function.htm
Regards
Sorin Cosofret
The neglected ionization energy variation for isoelectronic series can
reveal more useful information about electrons structure; the problem
is these data are in contradiction with actual quantum theory.
The quantum prediction for work functions values are in contradiction
with experiments; for metals, ionization energy and work function must
be equal but in reality they are not.
For other classes of compounds quantum mechanic fails again to predict
something. A striking example is the case of metallic oxides having
work functions values smaller then metals. It is outrageous how a
covalent or ionic bound liberate electrons easier then a metallic
bound in frame of actual physics.
The improved link:
http://www.elkadot.com/chemistry/Ionization%20energy%20and%20work%20function.htm
Regards
Sorin Cosofret